“From the rising of the sun even to its setting, My Name will be great among the Gentiles,” says Yahweh Sabaoth.
(Malachi 1: 11)
_____________
#####
If you are on the SnyderTalk email distribution list, clicking on the title at the top of the email will open SnyderTalk. Emails don’t contain videos that are very informative.
#####
The Migration Stampede is an Attempt to Overthrow the United States
Louise Arbour, the UN Special Representative for International Migration, is “very disappointed” because UN member states are reneging on their pledges to allow people to migrate to any country they choose at their discretion. Arbour thinks and the UN thinks that the right to migrate is a basic human right.
When viewed in context, the UN migration initiative is part of an orchestrated plot to create a global government. Read on.
Yesterday, I wrote that the UN has people on the ground in Mexico right now supporting the migrant mobs that are attacking the U.S. border. The UN is providing the migrants with support of various sorts including coaching on what to say at our border. It’s part of their effort to bring the U.S. into compliance with the UN migrant rights initiative and to subjugate U.S. interests to UN interests.
Below are three articles dealing with this issue.
From Gatestone Institute
UN Member States: Migration Is a Human Right:
The United Nations, in a non-binding agreement that almost all UN member states will sign at a ceremony in Morocco in early December, is making migration a human right.
The finalized text of the agreement, the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration, although officially non-binding, “puts migration firmly on the global agenda. It will be a point of reference for years to come and induce real change on the ground…” according to Jürg Lauber, the representative of Switzerland to the UN — who led the work on the agreement together with the representative of Mexico.
One immediate irony, of course, is that few countries have entry requirements as restrictive as Switzerland’s. If one wishes to stay more than three months, not only is a “residence permit” required, but, “In an effort to limit immigration from non-EU/EFTA countries, Swiss authorities impose strict annual limitations on the number of residence and work permits granted to foreigners.”
These hard-to-come-by-residencies have, unsurprisingly, become a source of income as “[r]ich foreigners ‘buy’ Swiss residency.”
The UN agreement, on the other hand, notes:
“Refugees and migrants are entitled to the same universal human rights and fundamental freedoms, which must be respected, protected and fulfilled at all times.” (Preamble, section 4)
It cannot be stressed enough that this agreement is not about refugees fleeing persecution, or their rights to protection under international law. Instead, the agreement propagates the radical idea that migration — for any reason — is something that needs to be promoted, enabled and protected. Almost all UN member states, except for the United States, Austria, Australia, Croatia, Hungary and possibly also the Czech Republic and Poland, are expected to sign it.
The UN has denied that migration is being made into a human right. “The question of whether this is an invidious way to start promoting a ‘human right to migrate’ is not correct. It’s not in the text; there’s no sinister project to advance that,” Louise Arbour, the UN special representative for international migration, recently said.
From UN News
Migration deal U-turns ‘reflect poorly’ on countries concerned: UN Special Representative:
In an exclusive interview with UN News, Louise Arbour, the UN Special Representative for International Migration, said on Tuesday that the stated intention of several countries (including Hungary, Poland, the Czech Republic and Austria) to pull out of the Global Compact for migration reflects poorly on them, and has seriously affected the spirit of multilateralism.
Ms. Arbour pointed out that the text was agreed following extensive negotiations – involving all Member States apart from the United States – that lasted for months, in which each country advanced their own interests and extracted concessions from others, and added that it was disappointing to see countries reverse their decision to sign up to the compact so soon after the text had been agreed by all participating parties.
On Sunday, Slovakia’s Prime Minister became the latest national leader to announce their withdrawal of support for the Compact, according to news reports.
However, she said that the vast majority of States are still signed up to the initiative: a cooperative non-binding document which is designed to set clear objectives to make migration safe, orderly and regular. It sets out to address the concerns of signatory governments while reinforcing national sovereignty; and recognizes the vulnerabilities faced by migrants.
Ms. Arbour says that, once implemented, it would allow migrants and Member States to prosper: “There is no question that we would see an increase in harvesting the benefits of migration and, very importantly, reducing some of its negative aspects such as irregular migration, with people moving in chaotic, dangerous ways,” she said.
“We would see a great improvement on the development aspects, the humanitarian aspect, and all the economic benefits that migration is capable of producing, if it’s well managed, in a cooperative way,” added the former High Commissioner for Human Rights, and senior Canadian judge.
From The Washington Post
UN envoy disappointed at nations reneging on migration deal:
The U.N. envoy for international migration said Tuesday she’s “very disappointed” that some countries are reneging on their support for a global compact to promote safe and orderly migration and reduce human smuggling and trafficking — some for “bizarre” reasons.
Louise Arbour said in an interview with The Associated Press that it’s also “puzzling” because the global compact is not legally binding and after its formal adoption next month “there is not a single country that is obligated to do anything that it doesn’t want to.”
In July, 192 countries unanimously agreed on the first global document to tackle migration after lengthy negotiations on the often contentious issue, with only the United States boycotting.
But in recent months, countries including Hungary, Austria, Israel, Poland, Switzerland and Australia have dropped their support and said they won’t attend the meeting in Marrakech, Morocco on Dec. 10-11 to formally approve the compact. And reservations have also been expressed in other countries such as Bulgaria, the Czech Republic and Slovakia.
Arbour said countries now having “second thoughts or misgivings” about the compact negotiated for six months in New York had “extracted concessions from others.” Destination countries for migrants, for example, pushed very hard for the return home of migrants if they’re no longer legitimately in a foreign country, she said.
The former Canadian judge and U.N. human rights commissioner, who will be secretary-general of the Marrakech meeting, said the backtracking on the agreement shows a “disconnect” in some countries between their foreign policies “and some domestic pressures or national concerns that obviously were not being fed into the process.”
“Many of them have expressed it, in frankly, rather bizarre terms,” Arbour said. “Some have said, for instance, we will not sign which is rather strange because there’s nothing to sign. It’s not a treaty. Others have said we will not come. Others have said we don’t endorse the compact.”
Global Government of Bust
The UN is determined to create a global governing body with taxing and enforcement powers. Of course, UN higher-ups think the UN should be the global governing authority despite all the evidence that the UN is corrupt and incorrigible.
Near unanimous agreement on the UN migration deal was led by Jürg Lauber, the representative of Switzerland to the UN, and the UN representative from Mexico, Juan José Gómez Camacho. Ironically, Switzerland and Mexico have some of the most restrictive immigration laws in the world.
According to Lauber, the UN migration deal “puts migration firmly on the global agenda. It will be a point of reference for years to come and induce real change on the ground.” That, my friends, is UN-speak for creating an agenda item and a narrative supporting it in hopes of eventually making it a global reality. In other words, this thing is just getting started.
UN Special Representative for International Migration Arbour said that the world will prosper when the immigration deal goes into effect: “There is no question that we would see an increase in harvesting the benefits of migration and, very importantly, reducing some of its negative aspects such as irregular migration, with people moving in chaotic, dangerous ways.” Arbour is delusional, and she’s not the only person at the UN suffering from that malady.
The Migration Stampede in Perspective
The migrant stampede in Mexico didn’t happen all of a sudden, and it didn’t come from out of the blue. It’s part of an orchestrated plot to overthrow the United States.
The UN migration agreement that was signed in July by 192 countries encountered only one obstacle, the U.S. Thanks to President Trump’s leadership, today other countries are waking up to reality and backing out of the deal.
The Mexico stampede was organized to punish President Trump for his audacity in believing that he was elected to represent the people of the U.S. The organizers, funders, and supporters of the operation are “liberal progressive” Democrats, their financial backers, rank and file Democrats who are essentially clueless, and the UN.
It helps to put things in perspective.
The Bigger Picture
Yahweh’s people are being attacked all over the world. Christians are being tortured and murdered. Anti-Semitism is on the rise. It has reached heights that we haven’t seen since the end of World War II. The UN is a hotbed of hatred aimed at Christians and Jews/Israel. In the UN, we are witnessing an effort to wipe them out. The attacks are being led by predominantly Muslim countries. They are the majority in the UN.
This is war. We’re in it whether we like it or not and whether we know it or not. Satan is attacking Yahweh by attacking His people. For the most part, Yahweh’s people are oblivious to what is going on all around them.
Yahweh wins in the end, but a lot of damage will be done to His people if they don’t wake up.
You can’t be faithful to Yahweh and support the “liberal progressive” Democrat or the UN agendas. Yahweh’s agenda and their agendas are mutually exclusive. There is no overlap.
#####
_____________
#####
#####
_____________
#####
“The glory which You have given Me I have given to them, that they may be one, just as We are one; I in them and You in Me, that they may be perfected in unity, so that the world may know that You sent Me, and loved them, even as You have loved Me. Father, I desire that they also, whom You have given Me, be with Me where I am, so that they may see My glory which You have given Me, for You loved Me before the foundation of the world.” (John 17: 22-24)
